ARB CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., and MARK MOLINA vs. COURT OF APPEALS
ARB
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., and MARK MOLINA vs. COURT OF APPEALS, TBS SECURITY AND
INVESTIGATION AGENCY represented by CECILIA R. BACLAY
G.R.
No. 126554. May 31, 2000
Facts:
1.
TBS
Security and Investigation Agency (TBSS) entered into two Service Contracts
with ARBC wherein TBSS agreed to provide and post security guards in the five
establishments being maintained by ARBC.
2.
This
contract shall be effective for a period of one year and shall be considered
automatically renewed for the same period unless otherwise a written notice of
termination shall have been given by one party to the other party thirty days
in advance.
3.
In
a letter ARBC informed TBSS of its desire to terminate the Service Contracts.
4.
ARBC
through its Vice President for Operations, Mark Molina, informed TBSS that it
was replacing its security guards with those of Global Security Investigation
Agency (GSIA).
5.
TBSS
informed ARBC that the latter could not preterminate the Service Contracts nor
could it post security guards from GSIA as it would run counter to the
provisions of their Service Contracts.
6.
TBSS
filed a Complaint for Preliminary Injunction against ARBC and GSIA.
7.
In
Answer, ARBC claimed that it decreased the number of security guards being
posted at its establishments to only one as the security guards assigned by
TBSS were found to be grossly negligent and inefficient, citing the some incidents
of it.
8.
TBSS
alleged in its Amended and Supplemental Complaint that ARBC, thru Molina
illegally deducted from the payroll an amount representing the value of one
unit concrete vibrator and cassette recorder. It further argued that ARBC
withheld additional amounts from its payroll as payment for the parts of the
grader that were stolen.
Issue:
Whether or not the compliant is
sufficient to hold Molina liable in his personal capacity
Ruling:
The
general rule is that officers of a corporation are not personally liable for
their official acts unless it is shown that they have exceeded their authority.
On
the basis hereof, petitioner Molina could not be held jointly and severally
liable for any obligation which petitioner ARBC may be held accountable for,
absent any proof of bad faith or malice on his part. Corollarily, it is also
incorrect on the part of the Court of Appeals to conclude that there was a
sufficient cause of action against Molina as to make him personally liable for
his actuations as Vice President for Operations of ARBC. A cursory reading of
the records of the instant case would reveal that Molina did not summarily
withhold certain amounts from the payroll of TBSS. Instead, he enumerated
instances which in his view were enough bases to do so.
Comments
Post a Comment